Monday, October 27, 2008
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Fla. Dems Good on Environment, Reps Not So Much
Alcee Hastings (D), 92%
Ron Klein (D), 92%
Timothy Mahoney (D), 92%
Kendrick Meek (D), 92%
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D), 92%
Bill Nelson (D), 91%
F. Allen Boyd (D), 85%
Corrine Brown (D), 85%
Kathy Castor (D), 85%
Robert Wexler (D), 69%
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R), 69%
Vern Buchanan (R), 62%
Gus Bilirakis (R), 38%
Ginny Brown-Waite (R), 38%
Mario Diaz-Balart (R), 38%
C.W. Bill Young (R), 38%
Mel Martinez (R), 36%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R), 31%
Ander Crenshaw (R), 15%
Ric Keller (R), 15%
Connie Mack (R), 8%
John Mica (R), 8%
Adam Putnam (R), 8%
Dave Weldon (R), 8%
Tom Feeney (R), 0%
Jeff Miller (R), 0%
Cliff Stearns (R), 0%
Esquire Endorsement
Crenshaw, our pick in '06, has tossed his principles overboard in favor of election-year expediency. Offshore drilling won't increase our national security. Electing a veteran who understands that "diplomacy is not appeasement" will.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Letter to the Editor on Crenshaw/McGovern Race
With the price of a barrel of crude oil fast approaching $140, it's no secret that our country is facing the most dire energy crisis in our history. Increasing demand and limited supply are causing prices to skyrocket with no end in sight. Jay McGovern recognizes the brutal impact these record gas and energy prices have on family budgets. While Ander Crenshaw offers more of the same failed, backward looking policies of the past eight years, Jay McGovern understands the complexity of the crisis we're facing and offers a fundamentally new way of thinking about energy solutions. McGovern knows that there is no single answer for removing our dependence on foreign oil. We need a sound, comprehensive approach to solving these problems, and Jay McGovern is just the man for the job. While some talk about energy solutions, McGovern makes it happen.
Jay McGovern is an engineer who is trained to solve problems. It's his job to take big problems, to break them down into smaller, more manageable problems, and to find solutions to those issues. He's carried over this analytical approach to problem solving into his personal life. Jay processes his own bio-diesel to fuel his car. While gas is $4 a gallon, Jay makes his own diesel to fuel his car for about 80 cents a gallon. At his farm, Jay has installed solar panels on his barn to produce hot water for his farm. In other words, Jay has lived his life in the pursuit of finding better alternatives to the energy dilemmas of our day, the types of renewable and alternative energy solutions in which our country so urgently requires investment.
On the other hand, Ander Crenshaw's voting record on energy legislation during his past eight years in office proves that he doesn't get what needs to be done to adequately address our gas and energy crisis. Here's a quick overview:
● Voted NO on raising corporate average fuel efficiency (CAFÉ) standards; incentives for alternative fuels. [Bill HR.6 ; vote number 2003-630 on Nov 18, 2003]
● Voted YES on passage of the Bush Administration national energy policy which authorized 25.7 billion dollars of tax breaks for the oil and energy industries while offering little in the way of incentives for conservation, alternative fuel, or renewable energy development. [Energy Policy Act of 2004; Bill HR 4503 ; vote number 2004-241 on Jun 15, 2004]
● Voted NO on keeping the moratorium on offshore drilling for oil. [Ocean Energy Resources Act; Bill H R 4761 ; vote number 2006-354 on Jun 29, 2006]
● Voted NO on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies which sought to end the unwarranted tax breaks & subsidies which have been lavished on Big Oil during the Bush Administration, a time of record prices at the gas pump and record oil industry profits. [Long-Term Energy Alternatives for the Nation(CLEAN); Bill HR 6 ("First 100 hours") ; vote number 2007-040 on Jan 18, 2007]
● Voted NO on tax incentives for renewable energy. [Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act; Bill H.R.5351 ; vote number 08-HR5351 on Feb 12, 2008]
Based on this record, it's no surprise that Crenshaw received a 0% rating from the Campaign for America's Future (CAF) on energy issues and a 5% rating from the League of Conservation Voters on environmental issues.
Crenshaw also supports a "gas tax holiday" over the summer. This idea, which John McCain and George Bush also support, has been thoroughly debunked as a gimmick that only enriches the pockets of Big Oil while passing on paltry savings to the consumer at the pump. Furthermore, this proposal does nothing to address the root cause of the problem -- our dependence on foreign oil. While Crenshaw offers gimmicks, McGovern provides real solutions.
The United States has only 5% of the world's population. However, we account for 30% of the world's automobiles, and we produce 45% of the world's automotive carbon dioxide emissions. Our addiction to oil harms our environment, our economy, and our national security. Jay McGovern understands these hard realties and knows that the only way we're going to break this costly cycle is to invest heavily in alternative fuel solutions and renewable sources of energy.
In much the same way the Space Race spawned numerous technological innovations in aerospace engineering and electronic communication which we consider commonplace today, Jay believes we should embark on a similar, bold, new race to develop sustainable and renewable energy sources. Whether it's clean coal, bio-fuels, wind, solar, hydrogen fuel cells, nuclear, or any future renewable technology that works – they're all components of a bigger, comprehensive solution.
Support Jay McGovern
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Republicans Don't Support Troops As Well As Dems
DAV:
Bill Nelson, 100
Allen Boyd, 100
Corrine Brown, 100
Kendrick Meek, 100
Robert Wexler, 100
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, 100
Alcee Hastings, 100
Mel Martinez, 60
Jeff Miller, 66
Ander Crenshaw, 66
Ginny Brown-Waite, 66
Cliff Stearns, 66
John Mica, 66
Ric Keller, 50
C.W. Bill Young, 66
Adam Putnam, 66
Connie Mack, 66
David Weldon, 66
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, 66
Lincoln Diaz-Balart, 66
Tom Feeney, 66
Mario Diaz-Balart, 66
Notice a pattern here? All of the Dems have 100%, while none of the Republicans has anything better than a mid-range "D." So much for supporting disabled troops.
IAVA:
Bill Nelson, A+
Allen Boyd, A
Corrine Brown, A
Kathy Castor, A
Timothy Mahoney, A
Kendrick Meek, B
Robert Wexler, A
D. Wasserman Schultz, A+
Ron Klein, A+
Alcee Hastings, A
Mel Martinez, B
Jeff Miller, B
Ander Crenshaw, B
G. Brown-Waite, B
Cliff Stearns, B
John Mica, B
Ric Keller, A
Gus Bilirakis, A
C.W. Bill Young, B
Adam Putnam, C
Vern Buchanan, B
Connie Mack, B
Dave Weldon, C
I. Ros-Lehtinen, A
L. Diaz-Balart, B
Tom Feeney, B
M. Diaz-Balart, B
Republicans do a little better on this one, with Keller, Bilirakis and Ros-Lehtinen all getting an "A." Dems still do better, Meek has the lowest grade on our side of the aisle, and he still has a "B." The only "A+" grades amongst Florida's delegation are Dems and the only grades below "B" are all Republicans. Again, which party actually supports the troops?
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Friday, July 4, 2008
Ander thinks we're stupid
Crenshaw Welcomes Passage of Terrorist Surveillance Bill
FISA Compromise Reached and Approved
by Congress after Long Delay
(Washington, DC) – Today, 125 days after the Democratic Congress allowed America's terrorist surveillance abilities to expire, Congress passed bi-partisan Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) legislation that restores and modernizes our Nation's ability to keep Americans safe from potential terrorist attacks.
That's a whopper, Ander. Neither the Democratic Congress, nor anyone else allowed America's terrorist surveillance abilities to expire. The 30-year-old FISA law, had been doing an adequate job until it met up with George Bush. The FISA law had not expired, it merely needed to be enforced.
Congressman Ander Crenshaw said, "The government was trying to regulate cutting edge surveillance technology with decades old legislation. It was time for a FISA makeover."
"It is the number one responsibility of the federal government to protect its citizens. I have consistently fought to ensure our nation has every possible tool to keep us safe from terrorist threats. While I am disappointed that it took so long to restore and strengthen these tools, I am pleased that we were able to work together and reach a compromise."
No, Ander, according to your oath of office, your number one responsibility is to protect and defend the CONSTITUTION. The Bush administration is the biggest terrorist organization our Constitution has ever seen.
The legislation was the latest effort to overhaul the 1978 FISA law – which sets procedures on overseas and domestic electronic surveillance. Due to new communications technologies developed since the first FISA law, this bill required a complete overhaul and modernization of surveillance rules.
Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Michael McConnell asked Congress to update the FISA legislation, making it "technologically neutral." He also requested that warrantless surveillance of suspected foreign terrorists be allowed when they are communicating with individuals within the United States.
The delay in passage was due to a political battle over whether or not telecommunications companies who provided the government information immediately following the attacks of September 11, 2001 could be sued retroactively. There are currently over 40 suits being filed against these companies who voluntarily worked with the government. The bill passed today, adds appropriate liability protections for such companies.
What's a little lawbreaking among friends and donors? And the public never gets to know the extent of the violations of our privacy, who was spied on or why or what the information is used for and who has access to it. And why won't the Bush administration show Congress proof of terrorist attacks that have been thwarted by this illegal spying?
"Protecting America is a responsibility that I take very seriously. There are radicals around the world who are actively planning attacks against us and we must be proactive in our efforts to stop them. This legislation strengthens our ability to do just that," added Crenshaw.
Oh, yeah, Ander? If you're all into "protecting America," then when are you going to serve in Iraq or send your family members? Not that attacking Iraq had anything to do with "protecting America" in the first place.
You just have to wonder if Ander is delusional. Ander, like a good representative of the Bush administration, insults his actual constituents in FL-4 with these distortions, exaggerations, misinformation, and outright lies.
Let's show Ander the door this year. Please donate to Jay McGovern, a worthy candidate for FL-4.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Ander Hates America and Its Values
Ander is Wasting Your Time in Washington
Jay McGovern (FL-4) Strong Challenger in a Red District
A first step we can take down this road is to support good candidates in supposedly red districts. Frequently this will mean spending money outside your own congressional district. If we only focus on our own districts, we'll never be in the majority, we need to work together to change the state, not just our own backyard. And the more candidates we help and the more candidates we help win, the more our congressional delegation will owe progressives when it comes time for them to vote on things like the recent FISA/telco immunity fiasco. Like it or not, politics works on the you-scratch-my-back-I'll-scratch-yours level a lot of the time. If we scratch their backs with our votes, our voices and our checkbooks, they'll have to scratch ours.
At the recent Jefferson-Jackson fundraiser in Hollywood, I met a candidate in this exact situation. Jay McGovern is running against Ander Crenshaw in Florida's fourth district. He sat and talked with me and a couple of very young Democrats for two hours. We found him to be a funny, intelligent guy who actually listened to what we had to say. He knew a lot about the issues and about his district and he was clearly someone who would be a great member of Congress, particularly when compared to Crenshaw.
The fourth district is a pretty Republican district (R+16) that covers the northernmost part of Florida from the edge of Tallahassee to the East Coast, with the bulk of the district's population sitting in Jacksonville. Since 2001, the seat has been held by Crenshaw, who is currently ranked as the 346th most powerful member of Congress. Tie that it in with his lifetime Progressive Punch score of less than 5% and you've got bad represenation for the District and for Floridians.
But it's a tough District for a Democrat to run in and Crenshaw has rarely attracted a strong challenger. Now he's facing McGovern, a former Naval aviator, engineer, businessman, community activist, family man and owner of a horse farm. He's significantly better on the issues than Crenshaw while still being true to his district and the people he'll represent. Of course, one of his horses would probably be better on the issues than Crenshaw, but I'd feel really comfortable with McGovern representing Florida in Washington.
But how will he get there? With our help. We all know that it takes money to win a congressional race, but we know that hard work and wise spending can help a good candidate defeat a Republican incumbent with more money, particularly such an ineffective Republican like Crenshaw. Especially in 2008, a Democratic year with a presidential candidate who will have long coattails and when the Republican party brand is as week as it has been in two decades.
So I'm challenging everyone who reads this to give what you can -- $5, $10, $25, $50, more -- to McGovern via the new ActBlue page we set up for him. I'm setting a modest goal of 10 contributors and $100 by Monday and I know you won't disappoint. Make sure that you give through our ActBlue page if you give, that way we can track our progress and our response. If it's a good response, it helps us convince candidates and elected officials we can help them and reminds them once they are in office that they should return the favor.
Learn more about Jay
Learn more about Crenshaw
Then help give Jay the resources he needs to defeat Crenshaw.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Ander Joins Bi-Partisan Crime Syndicate to Obstruct Justice
Laws? We don’t need no stinkin’ laws...sez Ander. At least no laws for the Washington elite and those we PAY to represent us.
Apparently incapable of independent thought and judgment, Ander, as usual, voted with his party and a bunch of lawless Democrats to support the cover-up of Bush’s illegal spying and to even give the Criminal in Chief expanded powers to eavesdrop on innocent citizens. Included in this gem of legislation was blanket retroactive amnesty for the telecoms who helped Bush spy on us, all without warrants, of course.
Ander hides behind the corrupt Democrats, Jay Rockefeller and Steny Hoyer, to excuse his vote for this piece of crap. I think his meaning is something like – Jay and Steny did it, so I did too. The truth is this bill is not supported by the American people and has no public benefit. It sets a dangerous precedent of a two-tiered justice system...one for the important, well-connected folks, and another for the little guys. So let’s test this theory. Here is Ander’s address. Send in your traffic tickets. Ander should be able and willing to issue a letter excusing them for you.
-
Jacksonville District Office:
1061 Riverside Avenue
Suite 100
Jacksonville, FL 32204
Main: 904-598-0481
Fax: 904-598-0486 -
Lake City District Office:
212 North Marion Avenue
Suite 209
Lake City, FL 32055
Main: 386-365-3316
Tollfree: 888-755-5607 -
Washington, DC Office:
127 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Main: 202-225-2501
Fax: 202-225-2504
Friday, June 13, 2008
Ander has a good job – tough luck if you don't
This bill would provide for 13 more weeks on unemployment benefits to workers exhausting their regular unemployment compensation. In states with unemployment rates above 6 percent, it would provide an additional 13 weeks, for a total of 26. The extension would apply to anyone whose benefits are exhausted before January 2009, an estimated 3.5 million.
But I'm sure no republicans in FL-04 have lost their jobs, so this won't anger Ander's base. Right?
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Ander says our laws are for sale...sells out 4th amendment
The House will soon vote again on the Protect America Act, a revision to FISA that includes retroactive immunity to telecoms that have helped the Bush administration spy illegally on innocent Americans. I've written and called Ander several times about this asking him to vote against retroactive immunity for lawbreaking and against giving the government expanded powers to spy on citizens. Ander stands firm that the telecoms should not be punished for this lawbreaking stating falsely that if they are not allowed to break the law, they will not be inclined to provide surveillance to help stop terrorist attacks in the future. This is a lie because the telecoms are required to respond to lawful court orders to wiretap when a warrant is issued.
I won't write all the details of the Protect America Act here as mcjoan at DailyKos, Glen Greenwald, digby at Hullabaloo, and others have written extensively and more eloquently than I could. Please read them for background if you are unfamiliar with this issue. The issue is really retroactive immunity for the Bush administration. If Congess passes this legislation with retroactive immunity, the current lawsuits will be dismissed, and we will never learn the extent of the lawbreaking the Bush administration has committed in spying on us.
Ander thinks we're stupid. Call him. Tell him to vote no on any legislation that includes retroactive immunity. Ander is supposed to represent his constituents, not AT&T. Let him know we're on to him. There may be a vote this week or next. He has already voted YES on a previous vote...he'll do it again.
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Ander Hates the Environment
Ander Crenshaw (REP), 5%
Not only did all of the Democrats do better than all of the Republicans, With one exception, all of the Democrats did more than twice as good as all the Republicans. And most of the Democrats voted in favor of the environment more than four times as frequently as most of the Republicans.
I wonder how many of these Republicans own property that will be beachfront property when most of Florida is under water because of global warming? I'm just saying...